Enterprise security reviews ask for proof, not promises. CoreNexo is the independent evidence and rating layer for AI agents, the record of what your agent actually did, and the one score computed from it.
Every enterprise security review asks the same thing: prove your agent does what you claim and show a record that holds up independently. A demo shows an agent can behave; it isn't proof that it did. Building that evidence pipeline in-house is expensive, off-core, and never as credible as a third party. And as the EU AI Act's obligations arrive, the burden lands on the person responsible for an agent's output.
In regulated manufacturing, every unit ships with a history record proving it was built to spec. AI agents need the same. We call it the Agent History Record, a tamper-evident account of how your agent actually behaved, built to be verified independently while your raw logs never leave you. NexoRating distils the record into a single trust score, the FICO or credit score for the agent economy. The record produces the score.
Above the platforms, beholden to no vendor's stack. A trust layer owned by any single platform is not a trust layer.
Tamper-evident evidence of what your agent did, held to a notary model: we anchor cryptographic proof and metadata, your raw logs stay with you.
Mathematically grounded metric computed from the record. The Agent History Record produces the rating.
Post-market surveillance for your agents, as a service.
The independent, tamper-evident evidence your enterprise customers ask for in security reviews without building the pipeline yourself. Legal responsibility never moves; the execution burden does.
Under the adopted Digital Omnibus, Article 50 transparency obligations apply from 2 August 2026, and Annex III high-risk obligations from 2 December 2027 with logging (Art. 12) and incident-reporting (Art. 73) duties and the Commission's draft guidance classifying compound agentic systems holistically, as one system. The Act doesn't mandate CoreNexo. It makes evidence your problem and when a regulator or a court asks what your agents did, the record is designed to be the answer that holds up independently.
Ahead: eIDAS qualified timestamps (Arts. 41–42): legal presumption of integrity and EU-wide admissibility. Built to reduce the burden, never to replace your legal responsibility.
We're taking on a small number of design partners ahead of launch, agent vendors who need to clear enterprise security reviews and get ahead of the AI Act's evidence expectations. If that's you, we'd like to hear from you.